FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 7, 2005
PSAC donates $175,000 for Tsunami disaster relief through Social Justice
Fund
OTTAWA * The Public Service Alliance of Canada Social Justice Fund will
contribute a minimum amount of $175,000 to disaster relief to victims and
to rebuilding efforts in the wake of the earthquake and tsunami in South Asia
and Africa.
"The members of our union, like all Canadians, have been greatly affected
by the immense suffering and devastation experienced by the people of South
Asia and Africa," said PSAC President Nycole Turmel. "There have been
so many lives lost and millions left homeless without food, clean water
and vulnerable to disease. We hope that our contribution, made on behalf
of all 150,000 PSAC members, to the international relief effort will help
bring much needed immediate support as well as help in the reconstruction
of devastated communities and economies."
About one-third or $60,000 of PSAC's initial total contribution will be
donated immediately to two Canadian aid agencies involved in emergency relief
efforts in affected areas, with $30,000 going to Oxfam Canada and $30,000
to Save the Children. Another $30,000 is earmarked for Doctors Without
Borders to support the second phase of its relief efforts.
The remaining amount, including future additional donations from PSAC
components, regions and locals, will be used to assist workers and their
organizations in affected areas to help restore their ability to earn an
income. This initiative will be undertaken in co-operation with the Canadian
and international labour movement.
This initial $175,000 contribution was raised from $50,000 from existing
funds in the union's Social Justice Fund, another $50,000 added to it by
unanimous decision of the PSAC National Board of Directors, and the
remainder from contributions by PSAC components, regions and locals.
In addition, the PSAC is encouraging its members across the
country to continue to donate to recognized aid organizations providing relief
and emergency assistance to affected countries.
-30-
For information: Joselito Calugay, PSAC communications
officer, (613) 560-4235 or (613) 293-9324
***Learn
how to make your own contribution! Click here....
PSAC 2006 National Convention Report
For those of us from the Union of Taxation the Convention started on Sunday,
April 30th at 9:00 with a Component caucus. As well as discussing
resolutions and planning convention strategy, it was an opportunity for
first time delegates to get together and review convention protocol.
A PSAC Regional caucus whereby observers and delegates gathered to discuss
convention issues from a regional perspective followed this meeting.
Sunday afternoon there was a PSAC Pacific Regional caucus as well as a
Political Action and Social Justice forum. The invited speakers and
their main topics were; Hassan Yussuff of the CLC, (Social Justice
Fund) Alex Munter, (Social Justice Fund) Olivia Chow NDP MP, (Child Care)
Carole Lavallee Bloc Quebecois MP, (Social Justice Fund, Anti Scab Legislation)
Jim Sinclair BC Federation of Labour (Privatization, Anti Scab Legislation).
Monday morning 9:00, Day 1
The convention begins with the song, “Solidarity Forever”, an Aboriginal
ceremony and opening remarks from Elder Tim Brown. He gave a heartfelt speech
centered on Aboriginal persons awareness and relationship with the
Earth and their struggles in preserving it for generations to come.
The National President then called the meeting to order.
Two speakers followed; John Cartwright, President of the Toronto and York
Region Labour Council and David Miller, Mayor of Toronto.
Address by the National President.
Adoption of the Rules of Order followed and a necessary debate ensued as
there had been some additions and changes to the rules prior to convention.
Adoption of the National President’s Report.
It wasn’t until after lunch and about 2:00 that the Finance Committee got
to the podium to deliver their report and recommendations. It wasn’t
long after that that the floor referred the recommendation back to the committee
to separate the recommendation to, first, deal with the strike fund levy
and two, deal with the dues increase. This topic was heavily
debated prior to and during the convention.
The meeting recessed at 6:00
Tuesday morning 9:00, Day 2
Rousing rendition of “Solidarity Forever”
It was time for the Constitution Committee to report. During this
time 2 resolutions were referred back to the committee for further study and
8 resolutions were passed.
Tuesday afternoon there was a Human Rights forum and the panel comprised
of; Maria Eva Villate a Human Rights activist and lawyer from Columbia,
Terry Fenge, Strategic Council to the Chair of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference
and a specialist in Aboriginal rights, interests and environmental affairs
and Sandra Carnegie-Douglas, program director for policy and special
projects with the Canadian Race Relations Foundation and President of the
Jamaican Canadian Association.
Delegates then adopted a new budget amended to eliminate the dues increase
by increasing the membership base and adjusting the average salary used
to calculate revenue to reflect actual salaries at the end of 2005. There
was also a reduction to a number of line items in the budget.
The day ended with an all candidates meeting, recess 7:00
Wednesday morning 9:00, Day 3
“Solidarity Forever”
This day started with many Privilege points dealing with funds that were
being collected throughout the convention for various causes. The
one cause that stood out was the fund for the Ekati Mine workers in the
north. At the end of the day $145,000 dollars was collected of behalf
of our brothers and sisters who are on strike at BHP Billiton Diamond Mines
Inc.
A well-attended outdoor rally was held at lunch to show our support for
the approximately 400 Ekati Mine workers.
The General Resolutions Committee managed to present 2 resolutions today,
not the least of which was a resolution to accept a policy on defending
quality public service. This resolution was carried and the consequence
will be a dues increase of .18 cents per member per month.
The Finance Committee came back with the following important recommendation,
which subsequently was carried.
“Strike Fund: PSAC will institute a special levy to replenish the strike
fund. From July 1 to December 31, 2006, the levy will be $2.00 per member
per month for members earning $30K a year or less; $5.00 per member per
month for members who earn more than $30K. From January 1, 2007 until the
strike fund has a balance of $25 million, a levy of $2.00 per member per
month for members earning $30K a year or less and $2.75 per member per month
for those earning more than $30K.
The month after this special levy ends, the regular contribution by members
to the strike fund will increase to $1.00 per member per month (up from
the current 35 cents). In future, whenever the strike fund balance falls
below $10 million, a special levy will be implemented until the fund balance
exceeds $25 million. That levy will be $2.00 per member per month for members
earning $30K or less and $4.00 for members earning more than $30K.” (PSAC)
Finance passed 3 other resolutions and then the Constitution Committee
came back and had two resolutions carried and two defeated.
The convention recessed at 6:00.
Thursday morning 9:00, Day 4
“Solidarity Forever”
After the credential committee reported we were introduced to our next
guest speaker, Ken Georgetti, first elected President of the Canadian Labour
Congress (CLC). Mr Georgetti pledged the support of the CLC to assist
the PSAC in their fight for quality public service.
The Collective Bargaining Committee was next up and managed to get 4 resolutions
dealt with. This doesn’t sound like much but the impact of these resolutions
will be greatly felt by the members. They dealt with the elimination
of regional rates of pay, Ships Crews being given their own bargaining table,
as well as defeating a changed to PSAC Reg 15, which would have given the
National President greater authority during negotiations and lastly a new
student employment policy. Highly consequential stuff,
which will result in an approximate .30 cent dues increase per member per
month.
A better part of the afternoon was devoted to well deserved tributes to
Nycole Turmel, National President, for her hard work and dedication to the
PSAC.
Convention Recessed at 4:30 in preparation for a dinner/dance to be held
in the same hall.
Friday 8:30, Day 5
“Solidarity Forever”
This morning was devoted to the elections for the positions of President,
Vice President and Alternate Vice President. Mr John Baglow chaired
the elections.
For the position of President, 4 persons were declared candidates.
John Gordon, Heather Brooker, Robyn Benson and Jean-Francois Des Lauriers.
After the first ballot Des Lauriers was dropped, following the second ballot
Brooker was dropped. John Gordon was elected President on the third
ballot.
The position of Vice President was decided after one vote between Patty
Ducharme and Joanne Ursino who was nominated from the floor. Delegates
elected Patty Ducharme as the National Executive Vice-President.
Richard Des Lauriers was elected Alternate Vice President winning in an
election over Jeannie Baldwin.
Elder Tim Brown returned to the dais with some closing remarks, which closed
the convention.
Convention was adjourned at 12:30
If anyone would like to see the actual convention reports, budgets and
guides please let me know and I will make them available to you.
You are also welcome to go on to the PSAC and UTE web sites to read more
news and view highlights from the convention.
In solidarity,
Wayne Little
President, Local 20028
President’s Report 2006
Welcome to the 2006 Annual General Meeting.
Recently, one of our members asked that I make an attempt to put more
humour into the AGM and my report. As hard as I try I just can’t find
anything funny about the way this employer manages our members and how it’s
now treating the Canadian taxpayer. Maybe there is some humour there.
I’m never sure whether to laugh or cry each time I see a new “initiative”
being introduced by this employer.
Locally, we have seen changes within the office. We are now dealing
with “affected” employees under Workforce Adjustment. We are working
hard nationally, regionally and locally to ensure our members are looked
after. I believe that we have made some successful progress within the confines
the employer has established. We will continue to be vigilant and to
that end we now have a WFA Committee in the office. It’s only taken
the employer 4 years to agree to it, but we now have it and this should help.
I’d like to acknowledge those members who assisted us with public information
plantgating last year. During that time we collected more that 600
signed letters from the public. I believe that this strategy assisted
us in having the employer keep the cash units open. We’ve started again,
and you will see more public plantgating in the near future and I ask all
of you to take some time and join us to help each other. As well, we
will start a new campaign aimed at contacting our MP’s and informing them
of the issues we’re facing.
I would also like to acknowledge the return of all our UTE members who
had to transfer to CEUDA a few years back. We never forgot you and
certainly welcome you back to the union you rightfully belong to. I’d like
to add and thank Barb Bell, local CEUDA president for the work she has done
representing members during this time. Barb has been a good friend
to our local and I trust she will continue to work hard for members.
As well, the EAP committee has been working diligently on this year’s
wellness fair. The date is May 3rd. Please take some time to
attend. The employer has granted 1 hour of leave for this event.
Last year I, along with other executive members, had the opportunity to
attend the UTE triennial convention. Two hi-lites from that convention
were; first, the convention passed a resolution to make the first VP position
a full time paid position. Certainly one reason why we decided to
ask Bob to attend our AGM. I believe it’s important for members to
get to know their elected officials. Secondly, a resolution was passed to
allow members to put forward bargaining demands anytime throughout the year.
I would suggest that if you have any thoughts or demands that you send them
to us now rather than waiting. This way, we will be able to get our
demands to the national a lot sooner and hopefully they will have more time
to gather and determine the best demands to put forward to the employer.
As I’ve said before this employer put the union and its members through
hell to get to our last agreement. Let’s not let it happen again.
I know our agreement isn’t up till Nov. 07, but believe me that date will
come sooner than you think.
I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the work of Gerry
McElroy, who is stepping down from the executive after 10 years of service.
Among other things, Gerry worked very hard ensuring that the members came
first. She was a constant reminder to the rest of the executive
of this point. I always looked forward to working with Gerry and I
know that, although she may not be attending meetings, she will be there when
called upon. We are very fortunate to have stewards like Gerry.
I would like to announce that we have some new executive members who will
be sworn in tonight. They are; newly appointed Secretary Tina Doehnel,
and stewards, Gord Leach, George Matthews, and Scott Parker. I applaud
them for getting involved and look forward to working with them on the executive.
As well, I would like to acknowledge and congratulate Cindy Little for
being elected President of the South Vancouver Island Area Council and Sara
Cousins for being elected as that Council’s new Treasurer.
I want to take this opportunity to thank the members of last year’s local
executive. John Rumsby, Vice President; Sara Cousins, Chief Shop Steward;
Cindy Little, Treasurer; Brenda Esplen, Secretary; and the stewards, Brenda
Busch, Gino Nasato, Anne Godwin, Gerry McElroy, Jackie Robertson, Tove Mills,
Deborah Sheeran. And a big thank you to Robert Mitchell who looks after our
website. I hope I didn’t leave anyone out. Thank you all.
As a local, we are very fortunate to have such dedicated people working
for us. I know a lot of the work that they do on your behalf goes
unseen but believe me when I say that they work tirelessly, unselfishly
and devote a lot of their own time to the local.
In closing, I apologise for the lack of humour, however, I’ll promise
to try and lighten up for the following year.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne Little
President
Local 20028
Press Conference Speech
April 1 2005
It’s time for Canadians to once again file their Income Tax returns
and pay their taxes. Just don’t try paying your taxes at the offices
of the Canada Revenue Agency. THIS IS NOT AN APRIL FOOL’S
JOKE!
Ladies and Gentlemen, I’m Betty Bannon, National President of the
Union of Taxation Employees, a component of the Public Service Alliance
of Canada. The Union of Taxation Employees, PSAC represents 23,000 members
employed by the Canada Revenue Agency.
Some time ago, the Government of Canada established an Expenditure
Review Committee to examine ways and means to save the government money.
Each department and agency was required to review how they conduct their
business and to make recommendations to this Committee to save money.
In spite of the Canada Revenue Agency’s slogan MORE WAYS
TO SERVE YOU!, one of the expenditure cuts proposed and accepted by
the Canada Revenue Agency was the closing of the cash and client service
counters at the 47 Canada Revenue Agency Tax Offices across the country.
Today, taxpayers can walk into any of the client service counters in
any of these 47 offices and be provided with service. Individuals and
small business owners rely on this service to make payments in a number
of ways, including cash. They currently also have the opportunity to receive
the answers they need with respect to their personal and business tax
questions. Problems with Income Tax assessments, filing inquiries, Child
Tax Benefits, GST rebates and other such matters can be dealt with on
the spot.
Although the Government announced its expenditure review initiative
in its recent budget announcement, the details of the service cuts have
not been announced. Furthermore, although the Canada Revenue Agency
has already decided to close its cash and client service counters, they
have withheld this information from the public. As a result, the Union
of Taxation Employees, PSAC has decided to launch a national campaign
commencing today to announce this initiative to the public and to strive
to have the Liberal Government and the Canada Revenue Agency to rescind
this decision.
Members of the public visit the Agency’s client service counters
for a number of reasons. Primarily, these taxpayers want to receive
their service face to face. Even the Canada Revenue Agency itself acknowledges
that this service is greatly needed by calculating “wait times”. In
its 2003-2004 report, the Agency standard was 20 minutes, which they
admit they achieved only 81% of the time. If members of the public have
to wait for service, it is clear that there is a need for the service,
even though telephone and electronic services are also available. And
the members of the Union of Taxation Employees, PSAC who are employed
by the Canada Revenue Agency also agree that this service is needed and
wish to continue to provide this service.
In future, instead of being able to walk in at their convenience,
anyone who needs tax assistance will now be required to phone the Agency
and make an appointment. The Agency call centres are already overworked
and anyone calling will now have to get in line just to make an appointment
The decision to close the cash and client counter and to eliminate
this service was not thought through by the Canada Revenue Agency, in
our opinion. The elimination of this service will affect all members
of the public and will profoundly affect seniors, low wage earners, recent
immigrants who may face language barriers, persons with literacy problems
and citizens eligible for GST rebates and Child Tax benefits. Frequent
and regular users such as Accountants, Lawyers, Tax Preparers and other
Tax professionals will also be greatly affected.
The Union of Taxation Employees, PSAC is at a loss to understand
why the Government of Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency would eliminate
a service that is so greatly needed by the Canadian public for the sole
purpose of saving money. We would understand, however, as we have done
in the past, when the Agency enhances services to the public through
the introduction or improvement of technology. This is not the case however,
with the elimination of these services.
Canadian taxpayers are currently paying for these services through
their taxes and we are confident that they will insist on the continuation
of these services. In spite of this, these taxpayers are being told
that they are no longer welcome to walk into the offices of the Canada
Revenue Agency without an appointment and they will not receive the services
that they deserve, and that cash payments will not be accepted from them
at these offices.
One focus of our national campaign is aimed at informing the public
of this unfair and arbitrary decision to eliminate services and to engage
them in assisting their own cause by voicing their dissent concerning
this unjust decision. To this end, we had attempted to have our members
distribute literature to the public today and to wear buttons with the
slogan “You’ll miss us when we’re gone” to bring this matter
to the attention of the public whom we are entrusted to serve. The Canada
Revenue Agency’s response to this was to deny all leave without pay
and vacation requests by our members to leaflet the public with information
and not to allow them to wear these buttons while serving the public.
We believe that this is an attempt to interfere with our right to publicize
this decision. They have also effectively placed a gag order on our
members by directing them not to discuss this issue with members of the
public, even when raised by these taxpayers whom we serve.
The Union of Taxation Employees, PSAC feels that you have the right
to know! We also intend to engage in a variety of activities to save
these services, including but not limited to, meeting with Members of
Parliament, as well as reaching out to affected organizations, such as
seniors’ groups like CARP, Canada’s Association for the Fifty Plus, whom
we have a representative in the audience today, tax professionals and
other citizens affected by this initiative. We also ask for the support
of the Canadian public and we ask that every Canadian strongly voice
their objection to the elimination of these services by contacting their
Members of Parliament and their local Canada Revenue Agency office.
Thank you.
Betty Bannon
National President
President's Conference
President’s Conference - March
2005
It was noted that the deadline for Convention is at 12 noon on Saturday.
Introductions and administrative details
Betty’s opening remarks - This year we have a lot of things to deal
with but we also have to discuss the impact of the Government Budget which
hit the GSU and UTE the most of all of the components. The executive council
has authorised a committee be struck to deal with this issue. Since there
are not as many items on the agenda we will get an opportunity to discuss
the issues at length. Each local needs to ensure that they have a WFA committee
to deal with the impacts of the budget. This will not be a short campaign
as the budget is laid out over 3 - 4 years. We need to do our campaign on
three front s. First of all we need to deal with the members and we all
know that we have members who are from the me generation. We have to get
them to wake up and activate all of the members. The second front is the
public. No one likes the tax man and we will not be able to centre our campaign
around what we are losing but on what Mr and Mrs Taxpayer will be losing.
One of the organizations we need to deal with is “grey power”, the older
generation as the don’t use ATMs and email etc as they like coming to deal
with use personally. The third front is the politician’s which we started
lobbying during the strike. Most of the MP’s don’t have any ideas and we
need to deal with this. We need to educate them that the jobs hit their constituents.
The information will be supplied that we can deal with the politicians at
all levels. This will be a large campaign and we will be striking the committee
quickly as we want to start the campaign by April 1st. The work will have
to be done at the local level as this type of campaign can not be done at
the top. We need the local’s commitment to get involved. During our next
few days we will need to come up with some solutions like a big brain storming
session. They will be taking notes and giving them to the committee. Sister
Turmel will be coming today to talk to us. An NDP member will also coming
today about the value of lobbying so we understand why we should go to the
politicians who implemented the budget. If every president gets involved
in the discussion, we will have a good conference. Two leather jackets will
be won this weekend.
Hilde brought forward her point of privilege about Jean.
Betty did a brief review of some of the resolutions that Executive
council passed such as Political Action Campaign and Communications Strategy.
Items:
§ Disciplinary review committee - across Canada
update - All locals reported what they’ve done with penalties and scabs
etc. Once the NBOD has finished with their ruling can the names be put on
the website? Betty - Yes. Betty asked Pierrette to put this down for discussion
and mentioned she would rather the names be all put up in one actions. It
was noted that there were four regions that had NO scabs. Also noted that
we had far fewer scabs than in 1991.
The chair requested that all locals that have not submitted a covering
letter for their resolutions need to do this to certify that Local has
submitted x number of resolutions. If they do not have one of the covering
documents they can just use a blank sheet of paper.
CEUDA and their designates - David Quist mentioned that not all
of the CEUDA designates were requested to submit all of their 25% amounts
and wanted to have UTE follow up with this with CEUDA. Betty emailed Ronny
Moran and then spoke with him where told his people that they had to do
this. He also asked for the PSAC Constitution about this. She has not received
a copy from him about this by letter and she is ready to charge Ronny Moran
if this

has not been done. If he has done this and some locals have not done
this she is prepared to charge the locals. Betty also got Sister Turmel
to mention this at the NBOD.
§ Variable work schedules and part-time work
status - David Quist - A member got a letter from their Doctor that they
should go on a variable work schedule instead of Part-time status. The employer
refused to allow them to do this. The member has since quit but they did file
a grievance on it.
§ Recycling bins - Penny - (mini bins) Chris
Aylward said that they now have a mini bin working group. There was a variety
of different scenarios in various locals. In Halifax they have had recycling
done by staff for the last 5 years. In Surrey we just found out that there
may be a problem with the classified waste where the handicapped people dealing
with this may be laid off. Surrey will be putting this on the UMC on the
24th and will update the UTE if needed.
Betty introduced David Christopherson, NDP MPP critic for labour. (Betty
listed his many credentials among which he was also a Local President of
a UAW local which is now CAW.) He also walked the picket line with members
in Hamilton during the strike.
David congratulated us on doing a phenomenal strike.
It’s important to sit down across from your rep telling them why your
situation is important. Be nice to start with and remember to phone ahead
and make an appointment. Don’t overwhelm them so only bring about 3 - 5 people
with you. At most they deserve respect. The only real power we have over
them is votes so make sure that you take someone who voted for them otherwise
they will have lost nothing if they don’t deal with your request. Then ask
for a commitment but if they won’t commit tell them that you will be forced
to vote for someone else. So get a commitment from them about something. We
want a paper trail and then hold them to it. Get your MPs as early as possible.
If you can get them to sign a letter etc as its harder to wiggle out of their
commitment if this is done. Make sure those visiting or writing provide their
addresses to show them that they are a voter. If you get a chance to hold
a news conference to show them you are on the side of the angels.
Remember that this is one way communication and reporters will go and
find out the MP’s position. Your members also love seeing you out there
speaking on their behalf.
Now if someone is out there threatening (don’t threaten something if
you can’t do it) tell them that you will be there on a weekly basis as
the MP’s do not like picket signs in front of their offices. Make sure
everyone else in Canada knows what you are doing so something can be coordinated
across Canada. The ultimate goal is to get their vote on way or another
as they need to represent their community,
If an MP is doing something for us reluctantly still say thank you
anyways. You want to be as credible and mature as possible. In the long
run you want their fear that if they don’t support your issues, you can
do something about their not getting re-elected. In the long run it’s all
about winning.
Betty commented that Mr Christopherson was informative and entertaining.
Ian Daykin asked if it has any effect to go above them by going to
their superior. Response - Not really unless they have not replied or dealt
with you. This would only help you if the leader is on side with you.
Betty gave Mr Christopherson a UTE sweatshirt to wear on our next picket
line.
Betty introduced Nycole Turmel. Nycole talked about the modernization
act. She also wanted to talk about the Federal Budget. She also mentioned
that during the strike we had a camper across from Mr Alcock’s office in
Winnipeg as he had to come out of his office sometime.
The eleven billion dollar budget cuts will effect around 11, 000 people.
What they are not saying is what they are not saying is what could happen
in moving people from one place to another. Nick stein is reviewing some
WFA info from PSAC which will be on our web soon. PSAC members need to make
people understand that services will be negatively affected and that the
cuts will have an effect on them.
Betty gave Nycole a notepad & a pen because she does not wear the
shirts.
Friday
Shawn Bergeron - Point of privilege on member
Norbert Wenzel - Point of privilege mentioned Health & Safety award
Patricia Payton received.
David Orfald and Jacquie deAguayo held a presentation on Bill C-25
Jacquie - The Public Service Labour Relations Act - It’s supposed to
be more enabling and is intended to make things more harmonious. This is
not true. It’s more about Divide and Conquer. Essential services
agreements will now ask, "Is the service essential?" To determine this
they’ve added a facility and an entire segment of the public. If we can’t
come to an agreement on this we have a complaint and we know how quick
they really are. If we decide that a service is an essential one, the employer
then has the right to set the level of service. We can’t challenge this.
Right now the designated worker only has to do their specific job but with
the new Act they have do everything that is deemed essential. There are
a lot of unknowns on how we will get to an agreement on who will be deemed
essential. The process will be a lot more work than before. There is something
called an emergency situation.
Currently we have strike votes but with this the union has to give
every worker a reasonable ability to vote and a reasonable chance to find
out what the vote was. The moment a strike vote was held a clock starts
ticking and the union has sixty days and we have to go out on strike. If
we don’t hold a strike right away we have to ask the EMPLOYER for an extension.
If we don’t want to do this we have to hold another vote. All members, rands,
suspended members etc must be allowed to vote. If denied they have ten days
to complain to the board.
There is a provision in the act that restricts picketing. You cannot
impede or attempt to impede essential workers. This will help them on an
injunction application. If you go up to an essential worker just to talk
to them and give them a paper, you may be considered to be impeding them.
Employer free speech clause - the employer has the right to express
his point of view as long as it doesn’t include coercion, intimidation etc.
If they then talk to the employees it is our obligation to prove they were
doing something wrong.
The Union cannot discipline members in a discriminatory manner and
the member has all sorts of avenues of appeal through the board etc.
There have been changes to the grievance procedure and adjudicators
now have the right to apply and enforce the Canadian Human Rights Act and
award $25,000 in damages, interest. Our collective Agreement still has the
No Discrimination clause.
There are two new kinds of grievances - Group Grievances and Policy
Grievances.
If you are grieving something monitory and the union is saying that
they are denying OT or something. In a group grievance only the members
who signed get paid. Whereas a policy grievance decides that the employer
did something wrong.
The new staffing according to the Act effective December 2005 will
be the same as the CRA’s.
David - Consultation and co-development are supposed to be part of
the nice stuff. Every deputy head MUST establish a consultation process
with the bargaining agents. Two particular areas are harassment and whistle-blowing
and we don’t think it will be any different than the current procedure.
You may find that the deputy head may try to establish a consultation with
all Unions simultaneously. Co-development is defined as a form of some kind
of enhanced consultation. This is thought of as a nice thing but is not
mandatory. As a union we have had some success with initiatives of co-dev
such as Term Studies etc. In all the situations where we have had success
it was because it was tied to collective bargaining.
About compensation research - This is a new thing for the board but
not the public service as there used to be a body that dealt with these things.
That body was closed in 1992 by the Mulroney government and this is one
of the few places that the Fryer report that the government picked up on.
The will help us establish that we actually make less than the public sector
but there are a few places that will result in the opposite.
Negotiations and dispute resolution - We are still prohibited to negotiate
anything about staffing, pensions etc. We can still choose to go the strike
route with conciliation or to go through arbitration. Notice to bargain
is now four months instead of three months prior to the expiry of the contract.
The chair of the board can now establish a mediator without our asking for
a mediator. There is now something concerning the public interest.
In the future we will have to give the conciliation board all of our
proposals. Also there will now be a list put together by the board and
the chair has to be approved by the minister. Right now this will be the
minister of Canadian heritage. If both parties agree the minister is just
supposed to rubber stamp the appointment. They used to have fourteen days
to report and seven days after that we can strike. Now they have thirty
days to report. The mandate for conciliation and the PICKS has an addition
of a factor to consider the state of the Canadian economy and the government’s
fiscal situation. We think there will be a bigger deal made out of this
than appears to the eye.
The most fundamental changes in the dispute resolution process will
affect how we do the strike vote process, when we do the vote and when we
actually strike. The don’t need to deal with the essential services
until twenty days after we serve notice to bargain. If we ask for conciliation,
do a strike vote at the same time, and we don’t have an essential services
agreement done we are in serious trouble of having the 60 days to strike
vote going stale. Through this legislation they have seriously affected our
ability to hold strike action.
How will the act affect the present ability to discipline our members?
Jacquie - There are transitional provisions in the bill but there are none
in the bill that give us guidance on that. Discipline that is occurring
now may well find its way in front of the board. Until such time as the
board establishes what constitutes discipline the present rules will probably
apply.
Co-development really means joint decision making. If one party does
not agree, we cannot go ahead.
Policy grievances will not function any different that the current
section 99 grievances. The time limits for filling provide for 31 calendar
days after the issue happens. With Section 99 grievances we had no time
limit. This may force management to deal with the problem more expeditiously.
This is only collective agreement stuff.
Betty thanked them for coming and gave them both UTE golf shirts. Betty
also noted that both Jacquie and Dave both wear their stuff around the
building.
§ On-line access Tracking System “OATS” - Complaints
that this is being used for discipline in some locals in Ontario. Pierre
Mulvihill mentioned that OATS was not mentioned to the tech change committee.
Betty said that they will look into this and issue a bulletin to ensure that
is only used for access purposes. Johann will send Betty any emails on this
as soon as he finds it.
§ Budget effects on CRA to be dealt with later.
§ UTE Web mail and email - Gerard complained
that the system is not retaining old emails when they are using forwarding.
Betty came back later with the solution that they will have a place on the
Webmail site to show all of these.
§ Rands - Gaetz/Halifax - quite a few locals
are having problems with having the Rands changed on their list when the
signed up. Betty wanted us to ensure that when someone is a “times-out” that
we notify the UTE if they are now PIPSC, quit or deceased etc.
§ Airfares - Jean Pierre - Airfares have been
changed since last year and the dollars that are being sent to locals have
been reduced by at least 30 %. Can we have this corrected? The bylaws talk
about “H” class fares and the airfares have been changed several times
and right now the air industry is in flux. Bob said that they had a problem
with this and as a result the decided to pay 1 ½ times latitude as
the regulation allows them to pay more than 1 time latitude. They will also
now try to ensure that the taxes are added into the fare dollars they send
out. Betty also responded that they will now be sending out 1 ½ times
latitude.
Bob mentioned that Delegates will be staying at the Delta ($129 + 15%
HST) and all of the Observers will be staying at the Hilton ($139 + 15%
HST). It was also noted that the Hilton is slightly better.
Bob also brought up that the Bank of Nova Scotia will be doing up a
package for members to try and get them some better deals on accounts, safety
deposit boxes and mortgages etc. They will be giving us a package on deals
at the Convention.
Chris said that there is a new first aid policy and there is a hang-up.
The employer wants to take the obligation of supplying a first aid kit
for members using their vehicle out of the policy. Another thing being
reviewed is the policy on the H & S workplace representatives. The
defibulators will not be issued until Treasury Board sends out something
and TB has stated that the employer can choose what they want to do. Posters
for April 22nd Earth Day and H & S will be handed out tomorrow.
Brother Bill Chedore from the CLC did a presentation on OSH, Bill C-25
and an overview of amendments to the criminal code. Westray April 9, 1992
was mentioned. The government knowingly failed to enforce H & S regulations
and failed to support JHSC. Corporate leadership flagrantly ignored H &
S. As a result 26 people died. H & S requires routine enforcement of
regulations and effective committees. (www.hazards.org <http://www.hazards.org>)
Betty gave Bill a UTE golf shirt as a thanks.
§ Targeted behavioural interviews and competency
assessors - Greg Reid asked how many assessors we have across the country?
Kent replied about 40 to 46. Greg had some problems with these assessors
and Betty said that any problems should be addressed through their RVP’s
first. Kent said that 80 % of our members should be deemed to meet
the competencies of their job.
Saturday
§ Designates and Dues deductions - Barry Melanson
- The PSAC had told members that the deductions had to be in by February
10th to received a receipt for 2004 but had not told the Locals.
§ A resolution was brought to the floor to ask
UTE to do a study to do a feasibility study on providing onsite daycare.
Passed.
§ The Pay Equity hearing was scheduled for Jan
18, 19 & 20 but heard on 18 & 19 and no response has been seen yet.
Bulletin No. 61 is on the Pay Equity web site to which you can subscribe.
The Pension hearing date has been set for November 15, 2005.
§ Deemed not qualified employee - Charlottetown
- A person who was deemed to be incompetent was put in an acting position
instead of people who were deemed to be competent in a pool. Discussion
was brought to the microphone. Chair of the Staffing Committee (Kent) mentioned
that the member should not be said to be deemed to be incompetent but should
be deemed to be not qualified. Kent mentioned that this was something they
foresaw a long time ago. The committee needs to have any situations sent
to them so the can show them to the employer. The problems here are the
selections tools - assessment criteria are wrong. The Ads and Directors
are not doing their jobs by telling HR that these processes do not work
and this is causing problems too. This is not getting any better but we
have to keep trying and all you can do is try to speak to your director
and appeal to his/her common sense. The people who are at the local level
that are making the decisions need to be dealt with and encouraged to do
the right thing. Betty mentioned that having “Staffing on the UMC agenda
on an ongoing basis is a good idea. This way management could bring forward
some of the staffing processes and they might be dealt with.
§ Health Canada Referrals - David Quist - When
the employer brought pout the injury and illness report we were the only
union who met with the employer. If we have some member who needs to have
a reduced number of hours due to an injury they like to send the member
to Health Canada. The chair of the H & S committee (Chris Aylward) mentioned
that they have to have reasonable grounds for not going by the member’s Doctor’s
letter. The employer simply saying because they want to does not meet the
test of reasonableness.
§ Appeals Reorganization - Barb Stewart - There
is a pilot reorganization going on in appeals. There is a relocation of
work happening and they will be reducing the number of chief of appeals.
Locals need to be aware that the WFA is to be applied in relocations. The
employer disregards the local’s comments when WFA is mentioned. Joe Parish
said that there are no appeals in small offices so it’s not a pilot, it’s
been done. Hilde Sellmeyer mentioned that they were a part of the pilot
and they would be the regional office to handle appeals. In Quebec, Jean-Pierre
Bonin mentioned that there is some consideration on people being moved around
and we need to ensure that the WFA is taken into the picture and to be careful
about applying the distance moved. Nick Stien mentioned that there are two
issues here and that the WFA needs to be dealt with and if needed a grievance
needs to be filed as they will not ignore a grievance. The other issue is
that the chiefs are now responsible for more than one office and the Admin
Assistants are now an affected employee.
§ Grievance replies - Gerard Ennis says that
there are a number of grievance replies that have the incorrect address.
Do they not check the system? Betty’s response was that they are probably
being taken from the grievance file so it’s important to ensure that the
file info is up-to-date.
§ PM 2 Auditor doing RAPs - Bob Carpenter -
This is probably taking away work from other clerks and officers. Several
other offices are doing this. What are they doing about it? Chair of the
staffing committee had a request to have the offices to show them where
this is in their job descriptions and then forward this on upward so it
can be dealt with as it’s not in their JD. Ester mentioned that when they
were part of Office Exam they did RAPs so when they went to Audit they
kept doing this. Bob mentioned that their people are not office exam officers
but are PM2 and PM3 Auditors.
Bob Campbell asked that more people send in articles for the newsletter.
At your AGMs please also check to ensure people are receiving the newsletter.
Ian Daykin asked if there could be a section for our successes at the National
level like a short review of an ITPR that we won. Bob responded that this
has already been done.
Bob also mentioned that they want people to look at the budget and
to ask questions now if they have any but not a million questions.
Betty was looking at putting a link on the UTE website to receive changes
in addresses that Sylvie would update. The returned mail was about a thousand
originally but has been reduced significantly since.
Betty then brought up two resolutions that were passed at Executive
Council. Resolution No. 31 and No. 32.
No. 31 Political Action Campaign - Press Kit
Be it resolved that UTE develop a political action campaign surrounding
the recent announcements under the expenditure review for the CRA.
Be it further resolved that the development of a Political Action Campaign
include a “Press Kit” and information package to be utilized by the local
executives and council members when contacting MP’s, MLA’s and local municipal
officials.
No. 32 - Communications Strategy
Be it resolved that the UTE Develop a Communications Strategy aimed
at educating the public and the media on the loss of CRA jobs which have
provided valuable services to the public.
Be it further resolved that the Communications strategy be developed
with the intention of beginning this campaign no later than April 1st,
2005.
Normand Pelletier said that we need to first know how the changes will
affect our members before we can deal with this at a local level. Betty
responded that the most that Government Services Canada was to be giving
out forms not specific tax information.
Various locals gave info on what they wanted included in the “Press
Kit”.
Concerning No. 32, Nick stated that his information says that there
will be not counter cash service in April 2006. We need to know when a workload
is going and to where so we can try to deal with this. We need to give
the message that we are still the engine that drives the revenue income.
They need to know that they are chopping the wrong part of the tree! Don’t
chop off the trunk and be sure that you are giving information out that
you really know.
Pamela said that she has confirmation that the counter will be closed
within the next 12-16 months and cash will be gone too. She also said that
there will be at least 40 jobs gone in the Pacific Region. This type of
campaign cannot go for a long stretch as this will happen in a short time.
It will be a fight between the three regions to see who gets the call site
as they are looking at one call site down the road.
Betty responded to a question about contracting out that she felt that
three areas they could already do this is in IT, HR and supplies etc.
Linda suggested that a button is done to have every cashier wear to
tell the public that this is the last season that they will get this service.
We need to let our staff know that we should no longer do volunteer for preparing
tax returns. We need to let our members know that the cash people will
be going but that there will still be cash etc coming in and we should not
do those peoples jobs so they can be laid off. These cuts also mean that
our equity groups will be very affected as they fill in the gaps with terms
from equity groups.
Richard Hyatt mentioned that cutting our services to the areas we volunteer
in is not a good suggestion as these are the people we need to reach to
keep them informed. Another member mentioned that these are the people that
really need us due to their situation financially etc.
Kent McDonald and Shane O’Brien along with two reps from CEUDA met
with the employer last Tuesday (a week ago) to discuss the Term study.
The Union believed that the CRA would sit down and explain how they would
implement the employer’s commitment to change the tenure of these employees.
At the meeting last week the employer said that that they had no intention
to consult with the Union on how this was to be done. They also told us that
they already hired 92 members through a competition. As a result of the
discussions at executive council they met with the employer yesterday at
lunch. In addition Linda Cassidy attended as the person who was at the original
meeting where they made the agreement. Yesterday two of them met with Dan
Tucker and the person who was in charge of this initiative. The employer
said that all they had to do was to ensure it was done and that’s all that
counts. We asked that we would be informed as to the present numbers and
where these people were etc. The employer lied to them yesterday as their
position changed as they were going to do the change of tenure by selection
process only. This was not in accordance with the original agreement. They
will compile a list of these 1100 individuals and give specific information
such as the office and what section they were in. One of the things that
perturbed Kent was the lack of the person dealing with this wanting to do
any work as the CAS system doesn’t tell them that. Kent responded what is
wrong with the telephone and she stated, “You wouldn’t want me to do all those
phone calls did you?” Kent said if they gave him the Phone #’s he would call
them. Kent told Dan Tucker that the employer had already set up a three year
review so they could follow up on staffing and they couldn’t follow up on
this? They should be able to pick up the phone and check on all of this.
Kent wanted all locals to go back and find out how many terms over
three they have and what are they going to be doing about them?
Annette Melanson gave a brief update on the Convention activities etc.
She mentioned the links on the website for PEI and other areas. It was
mentioned that there would be cool evenings and fog during July so please
keep the weather in mind. Air travel in and out of Saint John is not great
so book your flights as soon as you can to ensure that you get there when
you want to get there. Now about fun night info will be sent our and it
was asked that everyone Theme is Maritime Kitchen Party - Lobster 1 ¼
lb or steak or surf and turf or vegetarian quiche. The cost will be $35.
To begin the evening there will be a guided bus tour and there will also
be a shuttle for those that do not want to do the tour. There will be many
prizes and there will be a dance will be a band which we heard last night.
Letter from
David M. Odell, Vice-president Local 00001, Toronto East to John Cannis,
MP for Scarborough Centre on same gender marriage
February 2005
John Cannis,
MP for Scarborough Centre
Hi John,
I hope things are going well for you. Things are much better for me
now that we have a collective agreement.
I'm just dropping a note to let you know what this constituent thinks
on the issue of same gender marriage and the Civil Marriage Act. I meant
it to be a short note, but it got out of hand.
I come from a strongly religious family that has been in Canada for
many generations. I have ancestors that came to North America as early as
the early 1600's, if my cousin's genealogical research is to be believed.
The most recent arrivals came in the third and forth quarters of the nineteenth
century.
Canada has grown a tradition of tolerance, and grown well as we developed
that tradition. Our horizons of tolerance have grown over the years. In
our earliest days there was discrimination on the basis of culture and religion,
with conflict between the primarily French and Irish Roman Catholics, and
the mostly British protestant groups. We learned to get along, and prospered.
Other european groups were welcomed into Canada, and we continued to grow.
A more recent turning point came from the liberal governments' immigration
policies of the 60's and later, and we have further grown and prospered
with policies that welcomed people to Canada from all over the world.
In today's Toronto, and especially in Scarborough, where we both live,
we are hugely enriched by living in the most culturally diverse city in
the world. We share the streets and our workplaces with people of all faiths,
people from every ethnic group, people from all over the world.
The fundamental values expressed by recognizing and welcoming diversity
have given us the great city and country we live in.
Some people are writing you to say that they fundamentally beleive
that to be gay is evil. Some will say that allowing "those people" to marry
will tear apart the fabric of our society. I say they're full of crap.
Giving in to the attitude that some people are of less value, or are
less deserving of the full protection and benefit of our laws is what will
damage our country.
We welcome people of all cultures and religions. People who think to
be gay is morally wrong are free to believe that, the freedom to believe
as one chooses (or as our parents teach us) is protected. Personally I don't
understand how people can at the same time benefit from our laws protecting
rights, and yet argue against extending those protections to other identifiable
groups.
My own religion teaches me that the highest good is to love God, and
to love your neighbour as you love yourself. For me, as it applies to the
issue at hand, this means that it is a moral and religious imperative for
me to support equal access to marriage for people who are homosexuals.
I support equal access to marriage for myself, my children, people
who are Moslem, Jewish, Hindu, Eastern Orthodox, and everyone else. Straight
people got it by default. It's about time people who are homosexual got
it too.
I think that writing a law that protects all people's right to marry,
while at the same time allowing individual clergy to not marry people if
it is morally offensive to them is a good balance between the groups' rights.
I encourage you to do the right thing, and support the Civil Marriage Act.
Regards,
David M. Odell
President’s Report 2005
To begin, I would be less than truthful if I
were to say that the last year was
uneventful. What with contract negotiations, strikes, grievances, elections
it
was far from it. Contrarily, as a unionist
and activist it was both invigorating and
exciting. It’s what we do this work for.
A year ago we were wondering what would happen
with our collective
agreement and what the outcomes might be. Well,
now we not only know
the answers to those questions but we all had a say in its outcome
by way of the
ratification vote. 85% of the members across
the nation voted to accept the
agreement.
This employer put the union and its members through
hell to get to the tentative
agreement, but because of it I think that we became a stronger
local, regional and
national union.
It would have been easy for us to have rolled
over and given into all the employer’s
demands but we didn’t sacrifice the interests of smaller groups of
members for
the interests of the larger group and that speaks volumes as a union.
As a result of the strike I have seen more determination
and reliance from the
members and I believe that the employer has strengthened our
resolve to be a
better union and trust each other to ensure better practices and better
wages in the
workplace.
I’d like to take this opportunity to thank the
many persons who assisted during the
strike. The local executive, our picket
captains, designated employees who
walked the line and paid into the hardship fund, our national
bargaining team
and everyone at the national level who worked tirelessly to get
us the best
possible result. All the members in Client
Services, Cash, and the Mail Room who
stayed out during the strategic strike action and took on the extra
duties of walking
other picket lines and taking political actions.
Thank you!
But most of all I’d like to thank each of you
who by standing together as members,
were united and a force on the line. When
you were called upon you rallied and
stood shoulder to shoulder to show the employer your determination. I’m very
proud to say I’m a member of this local.
As we all know, the union movement developed
to protect the interests and to
improve the pay and working conditions of all its members. As an interest
group we differ from political parties because we exert pressure in
order for us to
protect that which we have and to gain that which we want for our members,
not to gain political power.
I’m sure there are more members of interest groups
than there are of political
parties yet, in my opinion; we don’t seem to apply enough pressure
to the power.
We can change that by getting more active. That
is why our local, and I’m sure
there are others, have put forward a resolution to this years
UTE Triennial
Convention to request that there be a standing Political Action committee
to
start working towards putting on that pressure.
What can you do? Well,
there will be a provincial election on May 17. Why
not
get involved? Why not volunteer, attend
meetings, and let your MLA know how
you feel about your issues. An excellent
way to start is by going to the union web
sites and getting the information you need.
Speaking of web sites - our local has recently
updated ours and I would like to
thank Robert Mitchell for getting this done. You
can find the address on the
magnet in your package. If you haven’t
already done so, please visit the site and
let us know what you think. Tell us what
you’d like to have on it and we’ll
do our best to accommodate.
Within the office we have a social committee
and last year this group passed
a budget to allow monies to be allocated to that committee. I know
we have
very good people working on the committee who are looking for ideas
for events
and I encourage all of you to send them your suggestions for social
activities.
I believe that I can speak for the entire executive when
I say; nobody said you
can’t have a little fun sometimes!
I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge
Betty Laporte who retired
last year. Among other things, Betty
worked very hard ensuring memberships
were up to date and that orientation sessions were given to new members.
We were fortunate to have been able to give Betty her
retirement gift at a party in
December.
I’d also like to acknowledge Jackie Robertson
for putting her name forward as a
steward and I am pleased to say that she is a new executive member
who will be
sworn in tonight. As well as Gino Nasato
and Sara Cousins for being elected to
the PSAC South Vancouver Island Area Council.
Gino is the newly elected
President and Sara is the new Treasurer. Congratulations
to all of you!
Finally in closing I want to take this opportunity
to thank the members of the local
Executive - John Rumsby, Vice President; Gino Nasato, Chief Shop
Steward; Cindy Little, Treasurer; Brenda Esplen, Secretary; and the
stewards,
Brenda Busch, Sara Cousins, Ann Godwin, Gerry McElroy, Robert Mitchell,
Tove Mills, James Little and Deborah Sheeran.
As a local, we are very fortunate to have such
dedicated people working for us.
I know a lot of the work that
they do on your behalf is never seen but believe me
when I say that they work tirelessly, unselfishly and devote a lot
of their own time
to this local.
In Solidarity,
Wayne Little
President, local 20028
President's
Message
This is a big year for the Union of Taxation Employees (UTE) as it is
a Convention year. This is the time for our union activists to review what
we have done and make decisions on the direction for our union for the next
three years. They will also be electing the National and Regional leadership
of UTE. It is healthy for any organization to periodically review its’ practices,
procedures, structure and certainly their future financial plan and UTE
is mandated to do this every three years.
Resolutions for convention to be debated and voted upon come from
two sources; the National Executive Council and locals. The deadline for
receipt of resolutions for this convention is noon, March 12th. These resolutions
will be sorted into four committees; By-laws, General, Finance and Collective
Bargaining. These committees will meet in April to review the resolutions
assigned to them and make recommendations to the convention delegates of
Concurrence, meaning the committee agrees with the resolution or one of Non-Concurrence,
meaning the committee does not agree with the resolution. The delegates
at the convention will then vote on the committee recommendations as each
committee reports to the convention floor on all of the resolutions assigned.
The resolutions may pertain to the operations of the UTE or the Public Service
Alliance of Canada (PSAC). Those that pertain to the UTE, if passed, will
be implemented immediately after the closure of the UTE Triennial Convention
and those that pertain to the PSAC will be forwarded to the PSAC Triennial
Convention that will be held in 2006.
This year, our Triennial Convention will be held in Saint John, New
Brunswick from July 13th to the 16th inclusive. There will be delegates from
every one of our 51 locals present at the convention. We operate on the basis
of representation by population so our delegate formula is one delegate for
the first 200 members and additional delegates for each 200 members or part
thereof. Since your local delegates will be representing you at the convention
you should make it a point of finding out who they are. This will provide
you an opportunity to give your input directly to the people who will be
speaking and voting on your behalf. The delegates will have the resolutions
and committee recommendations prior to the convention commencing.
Betty Bannon
National President, UTE
BC Regional Convention
Alert*** So far, your votes have placed
Cindy Little and Robert Mitchell as delegates and Sara Cousins sits as
first alternate, ready to take the place should a delegate be unable to
attend. Thanks to all who voted!
Nominations for delegates to the April 8-10 convention are now closed. Ballots
will be mailed out this week and next. Marked ballots must be received
back at the Vancouver PSAC office by Friday, February 25 in order to be
counted. Narratives for nominees are listed, by area, on the web. Hard
copies are also being mailed to all Locals, National Officers, Regional Council
members and all PSAC committees.
Four of your own
executive
are attempting to represent you at this vital convention.
Watch for your ballot in the mail and then speak to your executive or read
their
Delegate Candidate
Statements to gain a better understanding of why they wish to attend.
MEMORANDUM
January 18, 2005
TO:
AEC
Component Presidents
Andrée Massicott Branch Directors’ Team
FROM:
Nycole Turmel
At its meeting on Friday, January 14, 2005, the AEC approved
a political action donation to the National Coalition – Canadians for Equal
Marriage. This donation is in the form of office space and a number of ancillary
services that will see the coalition operate out in part of the former
RO space on the ground floor. The PSAC will pay rent to PSAC Holdings on
behalf of the coalition for part of the space that is currently unused.
I am sure that you will all join me in welcoming the coalition
and the four volunteers who will be working out of our offices for the next
three months.
You might find the following description from the AEC’s Political
Action decision of use in the event that you are asked questions with regard
to our support of the coalition.
Description
Senior Courts in
seven provinces and one territory have struck down the traditional definition
of marriage as an institution restricted to opposite-sex couples. Following
the initial legal decisions, the government drafted legislation and referred
it to the Supreme Court, by way of a reference to seek the Court’s opinion
as to whether the draft legislation was compatible with the Charter.
In a unanimous
decision in December 2004, the Supreme Court concluded that the Charter
protects gays and lesbians from being excluded from civil marriage, clearing
the way for the legislation to be tabled. The government has indicated that
the legislation will be tabled shortly after the House resumes on January
31st, and that it expects it to be passed by the summer recess.
The issue, Court
decisions and the prospect of Parliamentary debate has become the acid test
for equality in the first part of the decade, in Canada and many other countries.
It also draws into sharp contrast political parties with an affinity with
the religious right with parties that are more pluralist view.
In Canada, the
debate has given rise to a National Coalition – Canadians for Equal Marriage
– that has chapters in every Canadian province and territory, except Prince
Edward Island, Saskatchewan and the Yukon. In order to implement a coherent
and effective national and local lobby of Parliament, the National Coalition
is establishing an office from January 24, 2005 until the end of April.
The Coalition was
initially created by Egale and the United Church of Canada, and now has an
extensive list of supporting organizations including the CLC, CUPE and CAW.
A complete list of supporting organizations is available at: http://www.equal-marriage.ca/links.php
“
In Solidarity,
Nycole Turmel
National President
The National EO Conference was held January
13 - 16, 2005. The following presentation is available: Alexander Waddell
/Canadian Human Rights Commission "Human Rights Complaints & Discrimination
Prevention in
PowerPoint and in
PDF
January 7, 2005
PSAC donates $175,000 for Tsunami disaster relief through Social Justice
Fund
OTTAWA * The Public Service Alliance of Canada Social Justice Fund
will contribute a minimum amount of $175,000 to disaster relief to victims
and to rebuilding efforts in the wake of the earthquake and tsunami in
South Asia and Africa.
"The members of our union, like all Canadians, have been greatly affected
by the immense suffering and devastation experienced by the people of South
Asia and Africa," said PSAC President Nycole Turmel. "There have been
so many lives lost and millions left homeless without food, clean water
and vulnerable to disease. We hope that our contribution, made on behalf
of all 150,000 PSAC members, to the international relief effort will help
bring much needed immediate support as well as help in the reconstruction
of devastated communities and economies."
About one-third or $60,000 of PSAC's initial total contribution will
be donated immediately to two Canadian aid agencies involved in emergency
relief efforts in affected areas, with $30,000 going to Oxfam Canada and
$30,000 to Save the Children. Another $30,000 is earmarked for Doctors
Without Borders to support the second phase of its relief efforts.
The remaining amount, including future additional donations from PSAC
components, regions and locals, will be used to assist workers and their
organizations in affected areas to help restore their ability to earn an
income. This initiative will be undertaken in co-operation with the Canadian
and international labour movement.
This initial $175,000 contribution was raised from $50,000 from existing
funds in the union's Social Justice Fund, another $50,000 added to it by
unanimous decision of the PSAC National Board of Directors, and the
remainder from contributions by PSAC components, regions and locals.
In addition, the PSAC is encouraging its members across
the country to continue to donate to recognized aid organizations providing
relief and emergency assistance to affected countries.
-30-
For information: Joselito Calugay, PSAC communications
officer, (613) 560-4235 or (613) 293-9324
***Learn
how to make your own contribution! Click here....